wk2 Activities Blog Post in response to Brian Thomas - Post 2

The following is my response to Brian Thomas' blog posting on our week 2 readings. His post will follow my response.


Brian.

Although I didn't have the same reactions as you did in reading chapters 1-2, it was also the third chapter that really kicked me in the pants. I think what really made it powerful was the use of examples of the philosophy in practice.

I had a similar situation to you Josh during a school leadership meeting yesterday. In trying to develop the best possible STEM strategies for my school next year. I've had a hard time over the last few weeks in wrapping myself around some of the ideas that the other team members were suggesting. I thought about our readings this week and mentally said to myself that everyone in the conference room was deserving of an A, especially since we were all working towards making the learning environments for our students better. It was only then that I was able to see their viewpoints and progress was made in our planning.

______________________________________________________________

Brian Thomas Full Sail Reflections

Week 2 Reading - A Revelation

I think the thing that I learned most from the first two chapters of this book was something about myself. This “thing” is something that I’ve had to deal with throughout this course and upon reflection, throughout my entire life. I’m talking about the types of books that speak to me and the type that I really cannot in any way relate to. Unfortunately, this book seems to be of the latter. I would classify it as more of a philosophical get-in-touch-with-your-inner-self type book. After finished up the first couple chapters, I felt a rush of all the books I’d read come back to me – those I enjoyed and those I did not (regardless of the genre or content). As an individual with a severe case of concrete logical-mathematical thinking, I realize that my brain has a particularly hard time processing text that is deeply philosophical, yet reading a physics, chemistry, or calculus text is relatively easy. As is reading any manual on whatever the topic. And I find some of the statements in the book particularly hard for my brain to accept. Take this passage on p.20 for example: “The pie is enormous, and if you take a slice, the pie is whole again.” (Zander, 2000) Now, as we all know, if you subtract a part from the whole, as long as the part is > 0, you no longer have the whole, as is insinuated by the authors.

Poor mathematics aside, the awareness of my own strengths and weaknesses in reading opened my eyes to the difficulties that some student may have in reading such texts as I enjoy, and quite truthfully, this was my greatest take-away from the first couple chapters.

So, that aside, I do see the value of thinking outside the box, as explained in the text. Another part of the text that resonated with me was the part about scarcity thinking. I believe as Americans, we have really fallen into that mind-set and try to accumulate as much as we possibly can, without much regard for those that have little to nothing.

Moving into chapter three was fearful (because it was much longer than the infinitely long previous two chapters combined) but I was pleasantly surprised. I enjoyed the authors take on “giving an A” and thought at length about what kind of effect that would have on a student population I might be working with next year.

Ironically, I didn’t really start to get into the text myself until I watched the TED talk (which I had seen a couple years ago) and remembered how much I enjoyed watching Ben Zander. And at that point, I decided to give the book an A, and have enjoyed it much more ever since.